Does Phishing Training Work? A Large-Scale Empirical Assessment of Multi-Modal Training Grounded in the NIST Phish Scale
Primary Investigator:
Jamie Davis
Andrew Rozema, Jamie Davis
Abstract
Phishing remains a critical cybersecurity threat, often lead
ing to operational incidents and data breaches. Prior research
on the effectiveness of cybersecurity awareness training has
yielded mixed results, especially concerning the impact of
training on responses to phishing lures of varying diffi
culty. This paper presents a large-scale measurement study
(N ≈4000) conducted at a US-based international fintech
f
irm, evaluating the effectiveness of different phishing train
ing modalities. We compared a control group (no training),
traditional lecture-based training, and the same traditional
training augmented with an interactive phishing exercise.
We observed statistically significant differences
in
reporting rates following training. Although
lure efficacy—approximated using the NIST Phish
Scale—significantly impacted click-through rates, our analy
sis indicates that interactive training resulted in a statistically
significant improvement in reporting behavior. Specifically,
the interactive training group reported phishing attempts
37% more often than the baseline group and 25% more
frequently than those receiving traditional training. However,
the effect size remains modest. While interactive training
does enhance phishing reporting, its impact is limited. This
large-scale study contributes by demonstrating the practical
utility of the NIST Phish Scale and the limited benefits of
interactive training exercises in bolstering organizational
defenses against phishing